Analysis of the nursing intervention effect of obstetrics and gynecology in gestational diabetes mellitus
妊娠期合并糖尿病的妇产科护理干预效果分析

摘要

目的 妊娠期合并糖尿病的妇产科护理干预效果分析。方法 于2020.1至2021.1选择因妊娠期合并糖尿病而就诊于我院妇产科的病人进行调研，本次调研共纳入80例病人。妊娠期合并糖尿病病人就诊后均接受治疗，同时配合护理干预。按照护理举措将其归纳为2组，每组均纳入40例。根据护理方案将其命名为常规组、研究组。常规组所采用的护理方案为传统常规护理，研究组则采用妇产科护理干预。总结与探究2种护理方案实施效果。结果 （1）常规组不良妊娠结局发生率为20%，研究组不良妊娠结局发生率为5%，两组相比常规组不良妊娠结局高于研究组，两组对照存有明显差异，（P<0.05）。（2）常规组护理配合得分与研究组护理配合评分对照，常规组得分较低、研究组得分较高，两组对照存有明显差异，（P<0.05）。（3）常规组疾病常识知晓率为75%与研究组的97.5%相比较低，两组对照存有明显差异，（P<0.05）。结论 妊娠期合并糖尿病护理中，护理干预实施效果优异，此方案值得临床应用与普及。

Abstract

Objective To analyze the effect of obstetrics and gynecology nursing intervention for gestational diabetes mellitus.
Methods From 2020.1 to 2021.1, patients who visited the obstetrics and gynecology department of our hospital due to gestational diabetes mellitus were selected for investigation. A total of 80 patients were included in this investigation. All patients with gestational diabetes mellitus received treatment after treatment and cooperated with nursing intervention. According to the nursing measures, they were divided into 2 groups, and each group included 40 cases. According to the nursing plan, they were named as routine group and study group. The nursing program adopted in the routine group was traditional routine nursing, while the research group adopted obstetrics and gynecology nursing intervention. Summarize and explore the implementation effect of two nursing programs.
Results (1) The incidence of adverse pregnancy outcomes in the routine group was 20%, and the incidence of adverse pregnancy outcomes in the study group was 5%. Compared with the routine group, the adverse pregnancy outcomes in the two groups were higher than those in the research group, and there was a significant difference between the two groups (P <0.05). (2) The nursing cooperation score of the routine group was compared with the nursing cooperation score of the research group. The score of the routine group was lower and the score of the research group was higher, and there was a significant difference between the two groups (P<0.05). (3) The awareness rate of disease knowledge in the routine group was 75% lower than that in the research group, which was 97.5%, and there was a significant difference between the two groups (P<0.05).
Conclusion  s Nursing intervention in pregnancy with diabetes mellitus has an excellent effect, and this program is worthy of clinical application and popularization.