期刊目次

加入编委

期刊订阅

添加您的邮件地址以接收即将发行期刊数据:

Open Access Article

Contemporary Nursing. 2022; 3: (4) ; 71-74 ; DOI: 10.12208/j.cn.20220138.

Clinical application of MEWS score in 24-hour blood pressure management in perioperative period of strokeintervention
基于MEWS评分在脑卒中介入围术期24小时血压管理临床应用研究

作者: 梁晴晴, 凌晓辉 *, 汪佳

南京脑科医院脑血管救治中心 江苏南京

*通讯作者: 凌晓辉,单位:南京脑科医院脑血管救治中心 江苏南京;

发布时间: 2022-06-08 总浏览量: 1238

摘要

目的 探讨Mews评分系统在缺血性脑卒中介入治疗患者围术期24小时血压管理的临床应用效果。方法 采用整群抽样法,选取某三甲医院脑血管病救治中心2019年10月到2019年12月收治的43例患者作为对照组,未使用Mews评分;选取2020年1月到2020年8月收治的126例患者作为实验组,使用Mews评分,比较两组的血压监测合格率和并发症发生率。结果 两组患者年龄、性别、手术时间、穿刺部位比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),两组在血压监测合格率、并发症发生率的比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),与对照组相比,试验组利用Mews评分,血压控制效果显著,并发症发生率减少。结论 围术期介入治疗患者运用Mews评分进行血压管理,术后4h、12h、24h早期预警显著,降低术后并发症发生率。

关键词: MEWS评分;介入治疗围术期;24小时血压管理;缺血性脑卒中

Abstract

Objective To explore the clinical effect of Mews scoring system in 24-hour blood pressure management in patients with ischemic stroke undergoing interventional therapy.
Methods Using the method of cluster sampling, 43 patients from October to December 2019 were selected as the control group, and the Mews score was not used; The 126 patients from January to August 2020 were selected as the experimental group, and the Mews score was used. The qualified rate of blood pressure monitoring and the incidence of complications were compared between the two groups.
Results There was no significant difference in age, sex, operation time and puncture site between the two groups (P >0.05) . There was significant difference in the rate of qualified blood pressure monitoring and the rate of complications between the two groups (P <0.05). Compared with the control group, the experimental group had a significant blood pressure control effect using the Mews score, and the incidence of complications was reduced.
Conclusion   In patients undergoing perioperative interventional therapy, using Mews score for blood pressure management, early warning at 4h, 12h, and 24h after operation is significant, and the incidence of postoperative complications is reduced.

Key words: MEWS score; Perioperative interventional therapy; 24-hour blood pressure management; Ischemic stroke

参考文献 References

[1] 吴丽丽,黄丽华. 急性脑卒中护理质量指标新进展[J]. 护理与康复,2016,15(5):434-436.

[2] 于文琦,魏琳,张广清. 脑卒中护理敏感性质量指标评价体系的构建[J]. 重庆医学,2017,46(12):1720-1723. 

[3] 雷盼. 英国国家早期预警评分对急性脑出血患者预后的预测价值[D].延安大学,2018.

[4] 陈伦凤. 院前急救患者MEWS的分布特点及其临床应用的价值[J]. 中国医药指南,2016,14(28):86-87. 

[5] van Galen LS, Dijkstra CC, Ludikhuize J, et al. A Protocolised Once a Day Modified Early Warning Score (MEWS) Measurement Is an Appropriate Screening Tool for Major Adverse Events in a General Hospital Population[J]. PLoS One,2016,11(8):e0160811.

[6] Smith ME, Chiovaro JC, O'Neil M, et al. Early warning system scores for clinical deterioration in hospitalized patients: a systematic review[J]. Ann Am Thorac Soc,2014,11(9):1454-65.

[7] 殷传慧,冯红燕. 过渡期护理在ICU重度颅脑损伤患者中的应用[J]. 齐鲁护理杂志,2016,22(21):29-30. 

[8] 郑华光,刘慧慧,董漪,等. 2018美国心脏学会/美国卒中学会急性缺血性卒中早期管理指南新增推荐解读[J]. 中国卒中杂志,2018,13(1):81-85. 

[9] 中国卒中学会,中国卒中学会神经介入分会,中华预防医学会卒中预防与控制专业委员会介入学组. 急性缺血性卒中血管内治疗中国指南2018[J]. 中国卒中杂志,2018,13(7):706-729.

[10] 中华医学会外科学分会血管外科学组. 深静脉血栓形成的诊断和治疗指南(第二版)[J]. 中国血管外科杂志(电子版),2013,5(1):23-26.

[11] 董漪,桂莉,郑华光,等. 2019 AHA/ASA急性缺血性卒中早期管理指南全面解读(下)[J]. 中国卒中杂志,2020,15(1):63-74.

引用本文

梁晴晴, 凌晓辉, 汪佳, 基于MEWS评分在脑卒中介入围术期24小时血压管理临床应用研究[J]. 当代护理, 2022; 3: (4) : 71-74.