期刊目次

加入编委

期刊订阅

添加您的邮件地址以接收即将发行期刊数据:

Open Access Article

Contemporary Nursing. 2022; 3: (3) ; 88-90 ; DOI: 10.12208/j.cn.20220091.

Application value of high quality nursing in emergency rescue of acute food poisoning
优质护理在急诊急性食物中毒抢救中的应用价值

作者: 郭露 *, 廖嘉玲, 杨丹, 曾国峰, 肖飞

前海人寿广州总医院 广东广州

*通讯作者: 郭露,单位:前海人寿广州总医院 广东广州;

发布时间: 2022-05-17 总浏览量: 346

摘要

目的 分析优质护理用于急诊急性食物中毒抢救中的价值。方法 2020年12月-2021年12月本院急诊科接诊急性食物中毒病人40名,随机均分2组。试验组采取优质护理,而对照组行常规护理。对比抢救时间等指标。结果 从抢救时间与住院时间上看,试验组分别是(28.75±1.26)min、(3.99±0.41)d,和对照组(39.92±2.58)min、(7.08±0.83)d相比更短(P<0.05)。从并发症上看,试验组发生率0.0%,和对照组30.0%相比更低(P<0.05)。从满意度上看,试验组100.0%,和对照组70.0%相比更高(P<0.05)。结论 急诊急性食物中毒抢救用优质护理,效果更好,病人满意度更高,并发症发生率更低,住院时间更短。

关键词: 优质护理;住院时间;急性食物中毒;并发症

Abstract

Objective To analyze the value of high quality nursing in emergency rescue of acute food poisoning.
Methods Twenty patients with acute food poisoning were treated in the emergency department of our hospital from December 2020 to December 2021, randomly divided into 2 groups. The experimental group took high quality nursing, while the control group received routine nursing. Comparison of rescue time and other indicators.
Results Compared with the control group (39.92±2.58) min and (7.08±0.83) d, the rescue time and hospitalization time of the experimental group were (28.75±1.26) min and (3.99±0.41) d, respectively (P < 0.05). In terms of complications, the incidence of the experimental group was 0.0%, which was lower than that of the control group (30.0%) (P < 0.05). In terms of satisfaction, the experimental group was 100.0%, which was higher than the control group (70.0%) (P < 0.05).
Conclusion   High quality nursing for emergency acute food poisoning has better effect, higher patient satisfaction, lower complication rate and shorter hospitalization time.

Key words: Quality nursing; Length of hospital stay; Acute food poisoning; complications

参考文献 References

[1] 何左,周舟,李庆棠. 2005-2020年大理白族自治州食物中毒事件流行特征分析[J]. 中华灾害救援医学,2022,10(2):79-83. DOI:10.13919/j.issn.2095-6274.2022.02.005.

[2] HAIT, J, TALLENT, S, MELKA, D, et al. Prevalence of enterotoxins and toxin gene profiles of Staphylococcus aureus isolates recovered from a bakery involved in a second staphylococcal food poisoning occurrence[J]. Journal of applied microbiology,2014,117(3):866-875. 

[3] 张鹏,董建光,白丽丽,等. 53例肉毒杆菌食物中毒临床病例分析[J]. 中华危重病急救医学,2017,29(5):459-464. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-4352.2017.05.014.

[4] 吴开芳. 舒适护理和常规护理在急性食物中毒患者中的护理对比观察[J]. 中华养生保健,2021,39(6):74-76.

[5] 罗红梅. 探讨急性食物中毒患者的急诊护理措施与效果评价[J]. 中国医药指南,2019,17(29):264-265.

[6] SATO'O, YUSUKE, HISATSUNE, JUNZO, NAGASAKO, YURIA, et al. Positive Regulation of Staphylococcal Enterotoxin H by Rot (Repressor of Toxin) Protein and Its Importance in Clonal Complex 81 Subtype 1 Lineage-Related Food Poisoning[J]. Applied and Environmental Microbiology,2015,81(22):7782-7790. 

[7] 朱劲松,赵爱娟,赵海丰,董晓红,杨红伟,李艳美,曹玉杰,张晓丽,都继微,白聃,王静. 成批伤食物中毒急救人力资源管理模式的构建[J]. 护理学报,2015,22(23):24-26.

[8] 张爱霞,王立翠,史悦,于龙娟. 重症肉毒杆菌食物中毒患者一例的抢救与护理[J]. 解放军护理杂志,2016,33(17):47-49.

引用本文

郭露, 廖嘉玲, 杨丹, 曾国峰, 肖飞, 优质护理在急诊急性食物中毒抢救中的应用价值[J]. 当代护理, 2022; 3: (3) : 88-90.