Open Access Article
Contemporary Nursing. 2021; 2: (2) ; 17-19 ; DOI: 10.12208/j.cn.20210032.
Occupational hazards and protective measures for nursing staff in the department of infectious diseases
感染性疾病科护理人员职业危害因素与防护措施
作者:
杨晓敏,
孟司义 *
云南省第一人民医院感染性疾病科及肝病科 云南昆明
*通讯作者:
孟司义,单位:云南省第一人民医院感染性疾病科及肝病科 云南昆明;
发布时间: 2021-04-07 总浏览量: 762
PDF 全文下载
引用本文
收录截图(CNKI-Scholar)
摘要
目的 对感染性疾病科护理人员职业危害因素及防护措施进行研究。方法 本次实验对象为感染性疾病科护理人员,在2018年10月开展本次实验,在2020年10月结束本次实验,共计34名护理人员参与本次实验中来。对所选护理人员进行随机编号,对照组护理人员编号为奇数,实验组护理人员编号为偶数。通过常规管理模式管理对照组护理人员,通过职业危害预防模式管理实验组护理人员,对两组职业危害出现情况、护理人员认可情况进行分析和对比。结果 对本次实验进行系统的分析,实验组护理人员职业危害出现概率下降幅度相比对照组较大,职业危害出现概率分别为11.76%及35.29%,两组相关数据之间差异较为凸显,(p<0.05);对本次实验进行深入的分析,实验组护理人员认可度上升幅度相比对照组较大,认可度分别为82.35%及58.82%,两组相关数据之间差异较为凸显,(p<0.05)。结论 护理人员职业危害防范意识薄弱、防范能力较差、医院规章制度不完善是导致职业危害出现的主要原因,职业危害预防模式在降低职业危害出现概率、提高护理人员认可度方面作用较为突出。
关键词: 感染性疾病科;护理人员;职业危害
Abstract
Objective: To study the occupational hazards and protective measures of nursing staff in the department of infectious diseases. Methods: The subjects of this experiment were nurses in the Department of Infectious Diseases. The experiment was carried out in October 2018 and ended in October 2020. A total of 34 nurses participated in this experiment. Randomly number the selected nursing staff, the nursing staff number of the control group is an odd number, and the nursing staff number of the experimental group is an even number. The nursing staff in the control group were managed through the conventional management model, and the nursing staff in the experimental group were managed through the occupational hazard prevention model. The occurrence of occupational hazards and the recognition of the nursing staff in the two groups were analyzed and compared. Results: A systematic analysis of this experiment showed that the incidence of occupational hazards among nursing staff in the experimental group had a larger decline compared with the control group. The occupational hazards were 11.76% and 35.29%, respectively. The differences between the two groups of relevant data were more prominent. (P<0.05); According to the in-depth analysis of this experiment, the recognition rate of nursing staff in the experimental group increased more than that of the control group, and the recognition rates were 82.35% and 58.82%, respectively. The difference between the two groups of related data is more prominent. (P<0.05). Conclusion : Nursing staff have weak awareness of occupational hazard prevention, poor prevention capabilities, and imperfect hospital rules and regulations are the main reasons for occupational hazards. Occupational hazard prevention models play a prominent role in reducing the probability of occupational hazards and increasing the recognition of nurses.
Key words: Infectious Diseases Department; Nursing Staff; Occupational Hazards
参考文献 References
[1]
[2]
[3]
[4]
引用本文
杨晓敏, 孟司义, 感染性疾病科护理人员职业危害因素与防护措施[J]. 当代护理, 2021; 2: (2) : 17-19.