期刊目次

加入编委

期刊订阅

添加您的邮件地址以接收即将发行期刊数据:

Open Access Article

Contemporary Nursing. 2026; 7: (9) ; 178-182 ; DOI: 10.12208/j.cn.20260515.

Application and efficacy evaluation of a multidimensional assessment system in the postoperative rehabilitation of elderly gynecological patients
多维度评估体系在妇科老年患者术后康复中的应用与效果评估

作者: 纪晓乐, 王瑶, 徐婷 *

宁夏医科大学总医院心脑血管病医院妇科 宁夏银川

*通讯作者: 徐婷,单位:宁夏医科大学总医院心脑血管病医院妇科 宁夏银川 ;

发布时间: 2026-09-11 总浏览量: 26 下载量: 加载中...

摘要

目的 就当前人口老龄化的背景而言,老年妇科术后康复要应对生理衰退、心理脆弱、认知障碍和社会资源缺乏等诸项困难,单纯生理判断不能说明全部恢复情况。文中提出以生理、心理、认知、社会为四要素的综合评估思路,分析其对术后康复的实际意义。方法 按前瞻性队列方式收集2024年1月至2025年12月期间某三甲医院所接治的老年妇科手术病例(年龄≥60岁),将干预组置于多维评估和个体化照护之下,对照组只作一般护理,在术前及术后1、3、6个月使用PRI、HADS、GDS、MMSE、SF-36和SSQ来做测评,对比两组康复结果。结果 干预组术后6个月PRI评分(92±5vs80±6,p<0.01),并发症比例(2%vs18%,p<0.01),HADS-焦虑评分(6.0±1.8vs9.2±2.5),GDS阳性数(15%vs28%),MMSE改善量(10.2%vs1.5%)都比对照组好很多。结论 多维评估是改善老年妇科术后整体状况的有效方法,心理及社会类指标尤具价值,可望得到较广的临床运用。

关键词: 多维度评估体系;妇科老年患者;术后康复

Abstract

Objective Against the backdrop of an aging population, postoperative rehabilitation for elderly gynecological patients faces challenges such as physiological decline, psychological vulnerability, cognitive impairment, and a lack of social resources; relying solely on physiological assessments fails to capture the full picture of recovery. This paper proposes a comprehensive assessment framework incorporating four elements—physiological, psychological, cognitive, and social—and analyzes its practical significance for postoperative rehabilitation.
Methods A prospective cohort study was conducted on elderly patients (aged ≥60) undergoing gynecological surgery at a tertiary Grade-A hospital between January 2024 and December 2025. The intervention group received multidimensional assessment and individualized care, while the control group received standard nursing care. Assessments were performed preoperatively and at 1, 3, and 6 months postoperatively using PRI, HADS, GDS, MMSE, SF-36, and SSQ scales to compare rehabilitation outcomes.
Results At six months post-surgery, the intervention group demonstrated significantly better outcomes than the control group across several metrics: PRI score (92±5 vs. 80±6, p<0.01), complication rate (2% vs. 18%, p<0.01), HADS-Anxiety score (6.0±1.8 vs. 9.2±2.5), GDS positive rate (15% vs. 28%), and MMSE improvement (10.2% vs. 1.5%).
Conclusion   Multidimensional assessment is an effective method for improving the overall postoperative status of elderly gynecological patients. Psychological and social indicators are particularly valuable, suggesting promising potential for widespread clinical application.

Key words: Multidimensional assessment system; Elderly gynecological patients; Postoperative rehabilitation

参考文献 References

[1] 吴宏涛.老年女性如何进行妇科肿瘤治疗前的全面评估与管理[J].人人健康,2025,(01):94.

[2] 惠艳.如何评估妇科护理管理的效果与患者满意度[J].妈妈宝宝,2024,(09):112-114.

[3] 杨茜,张若,张国楠.老年妇科恶性肿瘤患者接受肿瘤治疗前的综合评估和管理[J].实用妇产科杂志,2024,40(05): 332-335.

[4] 田媛,高庆蕾.老年妇科恶性肿瘤患者全身系统治疗的选择及相关不良反应的评估和管理[J].实用妇产科杂志,2024,40(05):338-341.

[5] 陈顺利,刘琰,陈静,等.老年腹部手术患者术后亚谵妄综合征预测模型的构建[J].中华护理杂志,2024,59(16):2001-2008.

[6] 路平,王晓杰,郭海凌.老年乳腺癌患者术前衰弱与术后短期并发症的相关性研究[J].中华护理杂志,2024,59(08): 916-921.

[7] 何江,张欣宁,李翠翠,等.右美托咪定对老年妇科手术患者术后睡眠和恢复质量的影响[J].四川医学,2023,44(11): 1121-1126.

[8] 刘莉,陈守真.分析术中相关因素对老年患者妇科手术术后感染的影响[J].老年医学与保健,2023,29(03):606-610.

引用本文

纪晓乐, 王瑶, 徐婷, 多维度评估体系在妇科老年患者术后康复中的应用与效果评估[J]. 当代护理, 2026; 7: (9) : 178-182.