期刊目次

加入编委

期刊订阅

添加您的邮件地址以接收即将发行期刊数据:

Open Access Article

Contemporary Nursing. 2026; 7: (8) ; 124-126 ; DOI: 10.12208/j.cn.20260441.

The effectiveness of risk-based nursing interventions in elderly patients with unstable angina pectoris
基于风险分层的护理干预在老年不稳定型心绞痛患者中的应用效果

作者: 徐晶晶, 王朝辉 *

中日友好医院 北京

*通讯作者: 王朝辉,单位:中日友好医院 北京 ;

发布时间: 2026-08-06 总浏览量: 3 下载量: 加载中...

摘要

目的 本研究基于风险分层的护理干预模式开展,通过采用风险评估量表,将老年不稳定型心绞痛患者区分为不同风险等级,并据此制定差异化的护理方案,观察其在降低不良心血管事件发生率方面的具体成效。方法 选取本院(2025年1月-2026年1月)902例患者,按照双盲法分为两组,对照组(452例)患者接受常规护理干预,观察组(450例)患者接受风险分层护理干预,详细分析不同护理模式的干预效果差异。结果 两组患者护理干预3个月后MAE发生率显示,观察组低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(p<0.05)。结论 临床采用基于风险分层的护理干预,能够根据患者个体的危险等级实施差异化管理,有针对性地优化老年不稳定型心绞痛患者的护理方案,更有效地降低不良心血管事件的发生风险,从而为患者预后带来积极影响。

关键词: 老年不稳定型心绞痛;风险分层;不良心血管事件;护理效果

Abstract

Objective This study was conducted based on a risk-stratified nursing intervention model. Using a risk assessment scale, elderly patients with unstable angina were categorized into different risk levels, and differentiated nursing plans were formulated accordingly to observe their specific effects in reducing the incidence of adverse cardiovascular events.
Methods A total of 902 patients from our hospital (January 2025 to January 2026) were selected and divided into two groups using a double-blind method. The control group (452 cases) received conventional nursing interventions, while the observation group (450 cases) received risk-stratified nursing interventions. The differences in intervention effects between the two nursing models were analyzed in detail.
Results After 3 months of nursing intervention, the MAE incidence in the observation group was lower than that in the control group, with a statistically significant difference (p<0.05).
Conclusion   Clinical implementation of risk-stratified nursing interventions enables differentiated management based on individual patient risk levels, allowing for targeted optimization of nursing plans for elderly patients with unstable angina. This approach more effectively reduces the risk of adverse cardiovascular events, thereby positively impacting patient prognosis.

Key words: Unstable angina in the elderly; Risk stratification; Adverse cardiovascular events; Nursing efficacy

参考文献 References

[1] 韩笑,朱媛君,张乐乐.IMB 护理在冠心病行PCI术患者中的应用效果及对SAQ评分的影响[J] . 临床医学研究与实践,2024,9(30):105-109.

[2] 王毅.基于护理质量评价体系的护理模式在CCU患者中的应用效果[J] . 航空航天医学杂志,2024,35(12):1481-1483.

[3] 汪金亮,聂婷,卢文婷,等.GRACE、TIMI评分对非ST段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征患者不良心血管事件的评估价值[J] . 中华保健医学杂志,02024,26(5):554-557.

[4] 庄路,刘琳.GRACE评分导航分层护理对老年冠心病PCI患者心脏功能与不良心血管事件的影响[J] . 临床护理杂志, 2024,23(1):5-9.

[5] 黄伟伟.基于疾病系统管理模式的分层护理在冠心病心绞痛患者中的运用[J] . 国际护理学杂志,2023,42(11): 137-140.

[6] 刘瞻.基于 GRACE 联合CRUSADE评分的分级护理干预对ACS患者心功能及不良心血管事件的影响[J] . 国际护理学杂志,2023,42(11):2034-2037.

[7] 邵岩,于海初,张述文,等.PLR、NLR 联合 GRACE 评分对不稳定性心绞痛患者心血管主要不良事件的预测价值[J] . 山东医药,2022,62(22):50-53.

[8] 尚静.风险评估策略下的分层护理模式在高龄股骨粗隆间骨折术后患者中的应用观察[J] . 黑龙江中医药,2022, 51(3):243-245.

[9] 杨春萍,林素清,朱秀娴,等.风险评估引导式分层延续干预对急性冠状动脉综合征病人的影响分析[J] . 全科护理, 2020,18(13):1624-1626.

[10] 刘万花,冉小青.跌倒风险分层方法实施在住院患者护理安全管理中的应用价值分析[J] . 医药前沿,2020,10(25): 166-167.

引用本文

徐晶晶, 王朝辉, 基于风险分层的护理干预在老年不稳定型心绞痛患者中的应用效果[J]. 当代护理, 2026; 7: (8) : 124-126.