Application of rapid pre-hospital care intervention in the prevention and control of death risk caused by anaphylactic shock
院前极速护理干预在过敏性休克致死风险防控中的应用

摘要

目的 探究院前极速护理干预在过敏性休克致死风险防控中的应用。方法 在本院急诊接诊的过敏性休克患者中选取64例参与研究，随机分对照组和观察组各32例，分别予常规院前急救护理、院前极速护理干预，对比2组抢救成功率和并发症、症状缓解时间、致死风险评分情况。结果 观察组抢救成功率（96.88%）明显高于对照组的（81.25%）（P＜0.05）。观察组并发症发生率（3.13%）低于对照组（21.88%）（P＜0.05）。观察组胸闷缓解等症状缓解时间（11.23±2.45）min均显著短于对照组（18.65±3.21）min（P＜0.05）。干预30min后及转运至院内时，观察组致死风险评分均低于对照组（P＜0.05）。结论 院前极速护理干预可有效提升过敏性休克患者的抢救成功率，缩短症状缓解时间，降低并发症及致死风险，效果显著。

Abstract

Objective To explore the application of rapid pre-hospital care intervention in the prevention and control of death risk caused by anaphylactic shock.
Methods 64 patients with anaphylactic shock admitted to the emergency department of our hospital were selected for the study. They were randomly divided into a control group and an observation group, with 32 cases in each group. The control group received routine pre-hospital emergency care, while the observation group received rapid pre-hospital care intervention. The rescue success rate, complications, symptom relief time, and death risk score of the two groups were compared.
Results The rescue success rate of the observation group (96.88%) was significantly higher than that of the control group (81.25%) (P<0.05). The complication rate of the observation group (3.13%) was lower than that of the control group (21.88%) (P<0.05). The symptom relief time of chest tightness and other symptoms in the observation group (11.23±2.45) min was significantly shorter than that in the control group (18.65±3.21) min (P<0.05). After 30 minutes of intervention and when transferred to the hospital, the death risk score of the observation group was lower than that of the control group (P<0.05).
Conclusion   Rapid pre-hospital care intervention can effectively improve the rescue success rate of patients with anaphylactic shock, shorten the symptom relief time, reduce complications and death risk, and the effect is significant.