Open Access Article
Contemporary Nursing. 2025; 6: (10) ; 124-127 ; DOI: 10.12208/j.cn.20250539.
Comparison of the effectiveness of interdisciplinary collaborative nursing and traditional single-discipline nursing on the rehabilitation efficiency of elderly critical patients
跨学科协作护理模式与传统单科护理对老年重症患者康复效率的对比分析
作者:
刘家英 *
荆州市第一人民医院ICU 湖北荆州
*通讯作者:
刘家英,单位:荆州市第一人民医院ICU 湖北荆州;
发布时间: 2025-10-16 总浏览量: 159
PDF 全文下载
引用本文
摘要
目的 对比分析跨学科协作护理模式与传统单科护理模式在重症科老年重症患者康复效率中的应用效果。方法 随机选取我院重症科中的160例老年重症患者,分为两组,各80例。对照组采用传统单科护理,观察组采用跨学科协作护理。对比两组患者的一般资料、康复指标、负性情绪以及生活质量等进行分析。结果 两组患者的一般资料比较,没有显著性差异(P>0.05)。观察组患者的住院时间,导尿管拔管时间和首次下床活动时间明显短于对照组(P<0.005)。观察组患者的躯体疼痛评分在干预后明显低于对照组,精神健康和生活自理评分明显高于对照组(P<0.05)。观察组的护理满意度达97.50%,显著高于对照组的87.50%(P=0.015)。结论 对重症科的老年重症患者采用跨学科协作护理模式,可以明显提高患者的康复效率,减少负性情绪,提升生活质量,提高患者的满意度,具有明显优势。
关键词: 跨学科协作护理;传统单科护理;重症科老年重症患者;康复效率;生活质量
Abstract
Objective To compare the application effects of interdisciplinary collaborative nursing and traditional single-discipline nursing on the rehabilitation efficiency of elderly critical patients in the intensive care unit(ICU). Methods A total of 160 elderly critical patients in the ICU of our hospital were randomly selected and divided into two groups, with 80 cases in each group. The control group received traditional single-discipline nursing, while the observation group received interdisciplinary collaborative nursing. The general data, rehabilitation indicators, negative emotions, and quality of life of the two groups of patients were compared and analyzed. Results There was no significant difference in the general data between the two groups of patients(P>0.05).The hospitalization time, catheter removal time, and first-time out-of-bed activity time of the observation group were significantly shorter than those of the control group(P<0.005).After intervention, the body pain score of the observation group was significantly lower than that of the control group, while the mental health and self-care scores were significantly higher(P<0.05).The nursing satisfaction rate of the observation group reached 97.50%,which was significantly higher than that of the control group(87.50%)(P=0.015). Conclusion Interdisciplinary collaborative nursing for elderly critical patients in the ICU can significantly improve the rehabilitation efficiency, reduce negative emotions, enhance the quality of life, and increase patient satisfaction, showing obvious advantages.
Key words: Interdisciplinary collaborative nursing; Traditional single-discipline nursing; Elderly critical patients in ICU; Rehabilitation efficiency; Quality of life
参考文献 References
[1] 杨超.早期多学科协作护理在ICU重症机械通气患者中的应用效果[J].中外医学研究,2021,19(23):101-104.
[2] 耿寒.多学科协作模式护理干预对肝癌手术患者术后康复及生活质量的影响[J].实用中西医结合临床,2020, 20(17): 152-153.
[3] 范彩英,邹秀梅,洪翠芹,李彩贞,刘腾飞.多学科协作护理模式对急性脑卒中患者康复效果的研究[J].山西医药杂志,2021,50(11):1868-1871.
[4] 蔡娟.多学科协作模式联合层级护理在重症颅内感染患者中的应用[J].现代诊断与治疗,2020,31(15):2500-2501.
[5] 邓慧超陈美红.多学科协作模式防控重症加强护理病房多重耐药感染的效果[J].养生保健指南,2021,(22):217-217.
[6] 刘丽君闫焕姣.多学科协作应用于重症子痫前期患者急救护理中的价值[J].母婴世界,2020,(14):155-155.
[7] 江盼盼,徐影,王凯寒.多学科协作护理联合延续护理在重症急性胰腺炎患者中的应用[J].临床医学工程,2023, 30(03):389-390.
[8] 袁桂芳.多学科协作模式康复护理对促进脑卒中吞咽障碍患者功能康复的影响[J].黑龙江医学,2022, 46(18): 2260-2262.
引用本文
刘家英, 跨学科协作护理模式与传统单科护理对老年重症患者康复效率的对比分析[J]. 当代护理, 2025; 6: (10) : 124-127.