Comparative study on the results of using polyamine technology and saline method in clinical blood transfusion testing
临床输血检验中应用聚凝胺技术、盐水法的结果比较研究

摘要

目的 比较探究临床输血检验中应用聚凝胺技术、盐水法的结果。方法 将我院于2023年1月-2023年12月收治的84例需输血患者作为研究对象，通过随机数字表法分为对照组与观察组，每组各42例。对照组应用盐水法行交叉配血试验，观察组应用聚凝胺技术行交叉配血试验，对比两组检验效果。结果 观察组阳性检出率、准确度、灵敏度、稳定性均高于对照组，且组间交叉配血试验用时、输血不良反应发生率低于对照组，组间差异显著（P＜0.05）。结论 临床输血检验中应用聚凝胺技术临床价值高于盐水法，且其操作简便，准确度、灵敏度、稳定性较高，还可提高阳性检出率，降低交叉配血试验用时及输血不良反应发生风险。

Abstract

Objective To compare and explore the results of using polyamine technology and saline method in clinical blood transfusion testing.
Methods 84 patients who needed blood transfusion and were admitted to our hospital from January 2023 to December 2023 were selected as the study subjects. They were randomly divided into a control group and an observation group using a random number table method, with 42 cases in each group. The control group was subjected to a cross matching test using the saline method, while the observation group was subjected to a cross matching test using the polyamine technique. The test results were compared between the two groups.
Results The positive detection rate, accuracy, sensitivity, and stability of the observation group were higher than those of the control group, and the cross matching test time and incidence of transfusion adverse reactions between groups were lower than those of the control group, with significant differences between groups (P<0.05).
Conclusion   The application of polyamine technology in clinical blood transfusion testing has higher clinical value than saline method, and it is easy to operate, with high accuracy, sensitivity, and stability. It can also improve the positive detection rate, reduce the time required for cross matching tests, and reduce the risk of adverse transfusion reactions.