期刊目次

加入编委

期刊订阅

添加您的邮件地址以接收即将发行期刊数据:

Open Access Article

Contemporary Nursing. 2024; 5: (5) ; 38-40 ; DOI: 10.12208/j.cn.20240220.

Evaluation of seamless nursing intervention on improving the quality of life of uremic patients undergoing hemodialysis treatment
无缝隙护理干预对血液透析治疗尿毒症患者生活质量的改善评价

作者: 张萍, 张晓娟, 李荣, 俞春晖 *

联勤保障部队第九四三医院内科 甘肃武威

*通讯作者: 俞春晖,单位:联勤保障部队第九四三医院内科 甘肃武威;

发布时间: 2024-05-24 总浏览量: 128

摘要

目的 分析血液透析治疗尿毒症患者接受无缝隙护理干预对生活质量的改善作用。方法 筛选本院2022年8月至2023年8月开展血液透析治疗的尿毒症患者,将全体90例随机分组,各组45例。对照组予以常规护理,观察组予以无缝隙护理干预。评价干预前后两组生活质量变化;记录并发症情况。结果 干预后,两组生活质量综合评定问卷(GQOL-74)各个维度得分都比组内干预前有明显升高(P<0.05);并且观察组各维度得分升高较对照组更明显(P<0.05)。并发症总发生率对比,观察组较对照组下降更为明显(P<0.05)。结论 血液透析治疗尿毒症患者接受无缝隙护理干预,有助于减少并发症出现,促进生活质量改善。

关键词: 血液透析;尿毒症;无缝隙护理干预;生活质量

Abstract

Objective To analyze the effect of seamless nursing intervention on quality of life in patients with uremia treated by hemodialysis.
Methods All 90 patients with uremia who underwent hemodialysis treatment from August 2022 to August 2023 were randomly divided into 45 cases in each group. The control group was given routine nursing, the observation group was given seamless nursing intervention. The quality of life of the two groups was evaluated before and after the intervention. Complications were recorded.
Results After intervention, the scores of GQOL-74 in all dimensions were significantly higher in both groups than before intervention (P < 0.05). The score of the observation group was higher than that of the control group (P < 0.05). Compared with the control group, the total incidence of complications in the observation group decreased significantly (P < 0.05).
Conclusion   Seamless nursing intervention in hemodialysis treatment of uremia patients is helpful to reduce complications and improve the quality of life.

Key words: Hemodialysis; Uremia; Seamless nursing intervention; Quality of life

参考文献 References

[1] 张晓媛,康小梅. 基于家庭赋权的护理干预结合个体化饮食结构调整对尿毒症维持性血液透析患者营养状态、心境状态及生活质量的影响[J]. 临床医学研究与实践,2023,8(14):133-135. 

[2] 李立坤,范晓洁,顾敏杰,等. KTH整合式护理干预对尿毒症高通量血液透析患者GSES评分及生活质量的影响[J]. 山西卫生健康职业学院学报,2022,32(1):117-119.

[3] 苏阳. 认知行为护理联合膳食干预对尿毒症血液透析患者营养状态、免疫功能及生活质量的影响[J]. 中外医疗,2022,41(18):177-181. 

[4] 杨海蓉. 康复护理干预对尿毒症血液透析患者并发症及生活质量的影响探讨[J]. 中国实用医药,2021,16(15): 183-185. 

[5] 夏丽华,张庚娣,王霞,等. 细节护理干预对尿毒症血液透析患者并发症及生活质量的影响[J]. 系统医学,2021, 6(17): 156-159. 

[6] 张翠萍,刘锐,张婷. PDCA循环式家庭护理干预对尿毒症血液透析患者自我效能、生活质量、满意度的影响[J]. 护理实践与研究,2020,17(24):63-65. 

[7] 赵敏,宫雯雯. 优质护理干预对尿毒症血液透析患者营养状况、生活质量及并发症的影响[J]. 中国医药指南, 2020, 18(25):139-140,143.

[8] 曹芳萍. 综合护理干预对尿毒症血液透析患者不良情绪、治疗依从性及生活质量的影响[J]. 中国医药指南, 2020, 18(31):145-146.


引用本文

张萍, 张晓娟, 李荣, 俞春晖, 无缝隙护理干预对血液透析治疗尿毒症患者生活质量的改善评价[J]. 当代护理, 2024; 5: (5) : 38-40.