期刊目次

加入编委

期刊订阅

添加您的邮件地址以接收即将发行期刊数据:

Open Access Article

Contemporary Nursing. 2024; 5: (2) ; 135-137 ; DOI: 10.12208/j.cn.20240085.

The application effect of full process high-quality nursing in the perioperative periodof esophageal cancer patients
全程优质护理在食管癌患者围术期的应用效果

作者: 刘静 *

北京肿瘤医院 北京

*通讯作者: 刘静,单位:北京肿瘤医院 北京;

发布时间: 2024-02-23 总浏览量: 442

摘要

目的 探讨分析全程优质护理在食管癌患者围术期的应用效果。方法 2022年06月-2023年07月是选择病例接受临床治疗时间段,对应病例选择措施随机电脑程序抽选,选择疾病类型为接受治疗的164例食管癌我院患者,以不同组别参与研究,划分标准为不同干预方式,对照组与观察组,各82例,接受常规护理干预的为对照组,接受全程优质护理干预的为观察组,对研究完成后结果进行比较与分析。结果 干预前心理状态未见差异(P>0.05),干预后SAS与SDS评分相比均更低的为观察组(P<0.05)。肛门排气、排便以及住院时间相比均更低的为观察组(P<0.05)。结论 食管癌患者接受全程优质护理干预,能够获得更为理想的围术期康复效果,患者拥有了更加稳定的情绪状态。

关键词: 全程优质护理;食管癌;围术期

Abstract

Objective To explore and analyze the application effect of high-quality nursing throughout the entire process in the perioperative period of esophageal cancer patients.
Methods From June 2022 to July 2023, a period of clinical treatment was selected for the selected cases. The corresponding case selection measures were randomly selected using a computer program. 164 patients with esophageal cancer who received treatment were selected as the disease type. Different groups participated in the study and were divided into different intervention methods. There were 82 cases in the control group and 82 cases in the observation group, with the control group receiving routine nursing intervention and the observation group receiving high-quality nursing intervention throughout the process, Compare and analyze the results after the research is completed.
Results There was no significant difference in psychological status before intervention (P>0.05), and the observation group had lower SAS and SDS scores after intervention (P<0.05). The observation group had lower anal exhaust, defecation, and hospital stay compared to the control group (P<0.05).
Conclusion   Patients with esophageal cancer who receive high-quality nursing interventions throughout the process can achieve more ideal perioperative rehabilitation results, and they have a more stable emotional state.

Key words: High quality nursing throughout the process; Esophageal cancer; Perioperative period

参考文献 References

[1] 姚丽群,傅丽桑,陈静静. 五音特色护理结合快速康复外科理念在食管癌患者根治术后恢复中的作用[J]. 吉林医学,2022,43(6):1716-1719.

[2] 何冰,陈春红,巫考兰. 综合护理干预在食管癌围手术期护理中的应用效果观察[J]. 临床护理研究,2023,32(2): 59-61,64.

[3] 赵彩红,李培勤,张萌. 个体化护理联合呼吸功能锻炼在胸腔镜食管癌根治术后患者中的应用效果[J]. 中国民康医学,2023,35(14):158-162.

[4] 阮璐,孟丽丽,刘燕,等. 个体化营养支持联合协同护理在老年食管癌患者围术期中的应用效果[J]. 现代实用医学,2022,34(3):385-387. 

[5] 张蕾,陈志梅,曹晓东. 临床护理路径在食管癌患者围手术期护理中的应用效果探讨[J]. 当代医药论丛,2022, 20(11):189-192. 

[6] 陈明玉,曾金秋. 预见性护理联合无缝人文关怀对食管癌患者围手术期并发症和护理质量的影响[J]. 中国医药指南,2023,21(28):6-10.

[7] 米亚玲,王红玉,赵运芳. 综合干预在早期食管癌内镜黏膜下剥离术患者中的应用效果[J]. 癌症进展,2022,20 (13): 1360-1362,1372-1373. 

[8] 马雪瑶,张国瑜. Cox健康行为互动模式护理在食管癌围术期患者中的应用效果[J]. 中国民康医学,2023,35(16): 170-173.

引用本文

刘静, 全程优质护理在食管癌患者围术期的应用效果[J]. 当代护理, 2024; 5: (2) : 135-137.