Observation on the effect of comfort nursing in patients with cardiovascular disease
舒适护理在心血管疾病患者中的应用效果观察

摘要

目的 探讨舒适护理在心血管疾病中的应用效果。方法 根据本院2021年4月~2023年4月期间，将收治的心血管疾病患者，选取88例作为此项研究的对象，以患者入院的时间顺序进行随机分组，分成44例的对照组，行常规护理，以及44例的观察组，应用舒适护理，对2组患者护理前后的心理状态、护理满意度、护理舒适度与依从性评分及住院时间、并发症发生情况等指标展开对比，分析2组数据之间的差异。结果 观察组患者与对照组患者在护理前的SAS评分、SDS评分相比之下，区别不具有统计学意义，（P＞0.05），经过护理之后，观察组患者的SAS评分、SDS评分显著优于对照组患者各项评分，组间数据差异显著，（P＜0.05）；2组患者的护理满意度相比之下，观察组显著比对照组更高，（P＜0.05）；观察组患者的护理舒适度评分、护理依从性评分相比对照组患者较高，且住院时间更短于对照组患者，2组数据差异有统计学意义，（P＜0.05）；相比2组患者的并发症发生率，观察组要比对照组更少，（P＜0.05）。结论 对于心血管疾病的护理，临床应用舒适护理的效果更为理想，利于患者的不良心理情绪得以改善，减少其并发症，提高其舒适度，值得推广。

Abstract

Objective To explore the application effect of comfort nursing in cardiovascular disease.
Methods According to the period from April 2021 to April 2023 in our hospital, 88 patients with cardiovascular diseases were selected as the subjects of this study. They were randomly divided into a control group of 44 patients according to the time sequence of admission. Routine nursing care was given to 44 patients, and an observation group of 44 patients. Comfort nursing care was applied to evaluate the psychological status, nursing satisfaction, nursing comfort and compliance scores, and hospital stay of the two groups of patients before and after nursing care compare the occurrence of complications and other indicators, and analyze the differences between the two sets of data.
Results There was no statistically significant difference in SAS and SDS scores between the observation group and the control group before nursing (P>0.05). After nursing, the SAS and SDS scores of the observation group were significantly better than those of the control group, with significant differences in data between the groups (P<0.05); Compared with the control group, the nursing satisfaction of the observation group was significantly higher in the two groups of patients (P<0.05); The nursing comfort score and nursing compliance score of the observation group patients were higher than those of the control group patients, and the hospitalization time was shorter than that of the control group patients. The difference in data between the two groups was statistically significant (P<0.05); Compared to the two groups of patients, the incidence of complications in the observation group was lower than that in the control group (P<0.05).
Conclusion   For the nursing of cardiovascular diseases, the clinical application of comfort nursing has a more ideal effect, which is beneficial to the improvement of patients' bad mental mood, the reduction of their complications, and the improvement of their comfort. It is worth promoting.