期刊目次

加入编委

期刊订阅

添加您的邮件地址以接收即将发行期刊数据:

Open Access Article

Contemporary Nursing. 2023; 4: (9) ; 94-96 ; DOI: 10.12208/j.cn.20230434.

Application of predictive nursing intervention in pre-hospital integrated treatmentof trauma patients in emergency department
预见性护理干预在创伤患者急诊院前院内一体化救治中的应用

作者: 潘丽娟 *

中国人民解放军第八二医院(淮安八二医院) 江苏淮安

*通讯作者: 潘丽娟,单位:中国人民解放军第八二医院(淮安八二医院) 江苏淮安;

发布时间: 2023-09-18 总浏览量: 193

摘要

目的 探究分析预见性护理干预应用于创伤患者急诊院前院内一体化救治中的效果。方法 选取我院2021年1月至2023年1月期间急诊科收治的创伤患者50例,随机分组为观察组(25例,应用常规护理干预)和对照组(25例,应用预见性护理干预),对两组救治效果、院前院内抢救时间及患者并发症发生情况进行比较分析。结果 观察组救治效果明显优于对照组,同时,观察组与对照组院前院内抢救时间相比明显更短。此外,观察组并发症发生情况明显少于对照组。结论 预见性护理干预在创伤患者急诊院前院内一体化救治中应用效果显著,有利于提升急救救治效果,缩短院前院内抢救时间,同时有利于减少患者发生并发症,保障患者的生命安全,具有较好的临床应用价值。

关键词: 预见性护理干预;创伤;急诊;一体化救治

Abstract

Objective To explore the effective perioperative nursing methods and effects of total hysterectomy for adenomyosis.
Methods From May 2021 to May 2022, 110 patients with adenomyosis were treated with total hysterectomy. They were randomly divided into 2 groups: the experimental group received comprehensive nursing, and the control group received routine nursing. Compare SDS score and other indicators.
Results At the end of the intervention, the scores of SDS and SAS in the experimental group were (29.14±2.35) and (31.05±3.24), respectively, and the scores of the control group were (42.83±4.27) and (44.92±5.86), respectively (P < 0.05). Complications: The incidence of experimental group was 1.82%, which was significantly different from that of control group (12.73%) (P < 0.05). Sf-36 score: At the end of intervention, there was a significant difference between the experimental group (87.14±3.08) score and the control group (81.53±4.27) score (P < 0.05).
Conclusion   Comprehensive nursing for total hysterectomy of adenomyosis can relieve negative emotions more quickly, reduce the incidence of complications, and improve the quality of life more obviously.

Key words: Foresight nursing intervention; Trauma; Emergency treatment; Integrated treatment

参考文献 References

[1] 高亚维,刘正,李珂桢,等. 预见性护理干预在创伤患者急诊院前院内一体化救治中的应用[J]. 齐鲁护理杂志, 2021, 27 (14):64-66.

[2] 刘建凡,曹慧. 一体化链式创伤急救护理模式结合预见性创伤护理在多发伤患者急诊救治中的应用效果[J]. 临床医学研究与实践,2022,7(2):160-162.

[3] 樊鑫,张雪红,闫文艳,等. 预见性护理在创伤患者急诊院前院内一体化救治中的效果观察[J]. 自我保健,2021 (23): 210-211. 

[4] 李琳. 急诊创伤患者院前院内一体化救治中预见性护理的效果分析[J]. 健康之友,2022(15):155,157. 

[5] 董琳琳. 分析预见性创伤护理对急诊创伤性骨折患者救治效果的影响[J]. 中国伤残医学,2022,30(3):99-100.

[6] 刘红菊,杨素真. 预见性护理在急诊严重创伤性失血性休克患者中的效果及并发症发生率评价[J]. 中外医疗,2022,41(9):118-121,126. 

[7] 闫菊英,陈金玲,刘鲁昱.院前院内一体化创伤急救护理模式对急性出血性脑卒中患者预后的影响[J].2019,(21).

[8] 皮玲丽,李丹卉,谭薇,等.优化院前急诊护理及医疗处理流程对急性脑梗死发病后患者的影响[J].2020,(6).

引用本文

潘丽娟, 预见性护理干预在创伤患者急诊院前院内一体化救治中的应用[J]. 当代护理, 2023; 4: (9) : 94-96.