摘要
目的 研究阶梯式全程护理干预用于病毒性脑膜炎患者的效果。方法 纳入2022年收治的78例病毒性脑膜炎患者。常规干预组，39例行常规护理干预。阶梯式全程护理干预组，39例行阶梯式全程护理干预。观察效果。结果 干预12d后，阶梯式全程护理干预组的生活质量评分、护理满意率，对比常规干预组[（78.69±3.44）分对比（67.84±2.06）分；91.87%对比79.49%]，均更高，p＜0.05。阶梯式全程护理干预组的体温恢复正常时间、肢体和意识障碍恢复时间、住院时间，对比常规干预组[（2.57±0.14）d对比（3.91±0.45）d；（6.88±1.04）d对比（9.63±2.16）d；（13.28±1.05）d对比（16.89±2.24）d]，均更短，p＜0.05。阶梯式全程护理干预组的并发症发生率，对比常规干预组（5.12%对比20.49%）更低，p＜0.05。结论 阶梯式全程护理干预病毒性脑膜炎患者，患者病情控制、预后情况均越好。
关键词： 阶梯式；全程护理模式；病毒性脑膜炎；预后
Abstract
Objective To study the effect of stepped whole-process care intervention in patients with viral meningitis. Methods 78 cases of viral meningitis admitted in 2022 were included. Routine intervention group: 39 patients received routine nursing interventions. Stepped whole-process care intervention group: 39 patients received routine stepped whole-process care intervention. Observe the effect. Results After 12 days of intervention, the quality of life score and nursing satisfaction rate of the stepped whole-process care intervention group were higher than those of the routine intervention group [(78.69±3.44) points versus (67.84±2.06) points; 91.87% versus 79.49%], p < 0.05. The temperature recovery time, limb and consciousness disorder recovery time and hospital stay of the stepped whole-process care intervention group were shorter than those of the routine intervention group [(2.57±0.14) d versus (3.91±0.45) d; (6.88±1.04) d versus (9.63±2.16) d; (13.28±1.05) d versus (16.89±2.24) d], p < 0.05. The incidence of complications in the stepped whole-process care intervention group was lower than that in the routine intervention group (5.12% vs. 20.49%), p < 0.05. Conclusion The stepped whole-process care intervention in patients with viral meningitis has better condition control and prognosis.
Key words： Stepped; Whole-process care mode; Viral meningitis; Prognosis
参考文献 References
[1] 张晓侠,焦红侠,王小娟.人性化护理干预在小儿重症病毒性脑膜炎合并呼吸衰竭中的应用[J].实用临床医药杂志,2017,21(22):76-78
[2] 杨金娥.整体护理对重症病毒性脑膜炎合并呼吸衰竭患者康复的效果分析[J].中外医疗,2021,40(30):141-144 +149.
[3] 王秀容.针对性护理干预对病毒性脑膜炎合并症状性癫痫患者昏迷程度、自理能力及护理满意度的影响[J].实用医院临床杂志,2021,18(02):170-173.
[4] 丁红梅.阶梯式护理对化脓性脑膜炎患者临床症状及预后的影响分析[J].现代诊断与治疗,2020,31(18):2992 -2994.
[5] 迟巍,刘静,万佳彬等.阶梯式护理联合全程优化护理模式在细菌性脑膜炎患者中的应用[J].护理研究,2018, 32(24):3938-3940.
[6] 郁磊.人性化护理对重症病毒性脑膜炎合并呼吸衰竭患者症状缓解时间的影响分析[J].中外女性健康研究,2018 (21):150+152.
[7] 邹昀彦.结局回溯性特别关注护理在病毒性脑膜炎患者中的应用效果[J].当代护士(中旬刊),2018,25(09):94-96.
[8] 董梅,张国梅.整体性护理干预在病毒性脑膜炎合并症状性癫痫患者中的临床价值分析[J].中西医结合心血管病电子杂志,2018,6(11):94-95.
[9] 叶敬花,陈洪,薛丽美等.阶梯式护理对小儿化脓性脑膜炎临床预后指标的影响[J].中西医结合护理(中英文), 2022,8(03):115-117.
[10] 田倩,赵凤.阶梯式全程护理对病毒性脑膜炎患者预后及生活质量的影响研究[J].当代护士(上旬刊),2022,29(04): 55-57.