The nursing work before test analysis for clinical test quality analysis
检验分析前的护理工作对于临床检验质量分析

摘要

目的 探讨检验分析前的护理工作对于临床检验质量。方法 选取2020年1月至2021年6月间在本院就职的女性护理人员48例，通过数字随机表法进行分组，均分为参照组和实验组，每组各24例。检验分析前，参照组护理人员依照常规护理规范进行护理，实验组则接受严格的护理培训。对比两组的检验样本质量。结果 实验组检验样本质量不合格率（包括标识问题不合格、溶血不合格、凝固不合格、样本量不合适、采错容器/试管、采样时间错误、样本污染）明显低于参照组，差异均有统计意义（p＜0.05）。结论 检测分析前，护士通过接受严格的护理培训，检测样品的质量才更好，不合格因素的检出率更准确，值得临床进一步推广。因此，护士要注意提高技能，加强护理相关知识的考核和学习，有效掌握抽样方法和技术，及时总结问题和漏洞，及时分析、检查和纠正工作，更好地为患者服务。

Abstract

Objective To explore the nursing work before testing and analysis for the quality of clinical testing.
Methods A total of 48 female nursing staff who worked in our hospital from January 2020 to June 2021 were selected and divided into the reference group and the experimental group by the numerical random table method, with 24 cases in each group. Before test and analysis, nurses in the reference group were given nursing according to routine nursing standards, while nurses in the experimental group received strict nursing training. The quality of test samples was compared between the two groups.
Results The unqualified rate of the test samples in the experimental group (including unqualified labeling, unqualified hemolysis, unqualified coagulation, inappropriate sample size, wrong container/tube collection, wrong sampling time, and sample contamination) was significantly lower than that in the reference group, and the differences were statistically significant (p < 0.05).
Conclusion   Before testing and analysis, nurses can receive strict nursing training to better test sample quality and more accurate detection rate of unqualified factors, which is worthy of further clinical promotion. Therefore, nurses should pay attention to improve their skills, strengthen the examination and learning of nursing related knowledge, effectively master sampling methods and techniques, timely summarize problems and loopholes, timely analyze, check and correct the work, and better serve patients.