Open Access Article
Contemporary Nursing. 2022; 3: (10) ; 151-154 ; DOI: 10.12208/j.cn.20220468.
Application of predictive nursing in pre-hospital emergency treatment of critically ill patients
预见性护理在院前急危重症患者急救与转运中的应用探讨
作者:
何乾峰,
苑静,
何佩瑶,
班菲,
白惠,
王红,
杨亚芸,
刘佩肖,
樊惠强,
李雪,
姚鑫,
徐璐瑶 *
前海人寿西安医院护理部 陕西西安
武警陕西省总队医院门诊部 陕西西安
空军军医大学唐都医院急诊科 陕西西安
西安国际医学中心医院神经外科 陕西西安
*通讯作者:
徐璐瑶,单位:西安国际医学中心医院神经外科 陕西西安;
发布时间: 2022-12-12 总浏览量: 516
PDF 全文下载
引用本文
万方数据(WANFANG DATA)
摘要
目的 分析预见性护理在院前急救急危重症患者转运中的应用效果。方法 回顾性分析100例院前急救急危重症患者临床资料,入院时间段2020年6月~2022年7月,随机分两组,Y组50例患者,采用预见性护理,C组50例患者,采用常规护理,比较Y组及C组患者的护理效果。结果 通过表1看出两组治疗时间、抢救时间、住院时间差距明显,Y组患者的治疗时间、抢救时间、住院时间短于C组,具备统计学意义(P<0.05)。通过表2看出两组护理满意度差距明显,Y组患者的护理满意度优于C组,具备统计学意义(P<0.05)。通过表3看出两组急救效果与抢救成功率差距明显,Y组患者的急救效果与抢救成功率高于C组,具备统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 预见性护理在院前急救急危重症患者转运中的应用效果尤为突出,值得临床推广利用。
关键词: 预见性护理;急诊;转运;护理模式
Abstract
Objective To analyze the application effect of predictive nursing in pre-hospital emergency treatment of critically ill patients. Methods The clinical data of 100 pre-hospital emergency patients were retrospectively analyzed. The admission time was from June 2020 to July 2022. They were randomly divided into two groups, group Y (50 cases) and group C (50 cases) with predictive nursing and routine nursing. The nursing effects of group Y and group C were compared. Results From Table 1, it can be seen that there is a significant difference in treatment time, rescue time and hospitalization time between the two groups. The treatment time, rescue time and hospitalization time of patients in Group Y are shorter than those in Group C, with statistical significance (P<0.05). Table 2 shows that there is a significant difference in nursing satisfaction between the two groups. The nursing satisfaction of patients in Group Y is better than that of Group C, with statistical significance (P<0.05). It can be seen from Table 3 that there is a significant difference between the first aid effect and the success rate of transportation between the two groups. The first aid effect and the success rate of transportation of patients in Group Y are higher than those in Group C, with statistical significance (P<0.05). Conclusion The application effect of predictive nursing in pre-hospital emergency treatment of critically ill patients is particularly prominent, and it is worthy of clinical application.
Key words: Predictive nursing; Emergency treatment; Transshipment; Nursing mode
参考文献 References
[1] 郭世燕,贾灿灿.预见性护理在院前急救急危重症患者转运中的应用[J].河南医学高等专科学校学报,2021,33(06):737-739.
[2] 白向威,杨巧芳,赵旭林,陈秋平,程梅,王萌.多学科团队协作在心血管急危重症患者院际转运中的应用研究[J].天津护理,2022,30(03):253-257.
[3] 陈燕,陈婷,刘姗萍,吴月英.预见性护理在院前急救急危重症患者转运中的应用[J].护理实践与研究,2020,17(06):158-159.
[4] 马晓莉,刘霞,侯明.预见性护理在院前急救急危重症病人转运中的应用[J].临床医药文献电子杂志,2017,4(64):12570-12571.
[5] 陈小红,陶玉燕,张茹.急危重症患者院前急救转运中应用预见性护理的效果研究[J].名医,2020(10):186-187.
[6] 袁玲.预见性护理在院前急救急危重症患者转运中的应用分析[J].中国现代医生,2020,58(20):143-146.
[7] 胡慧敏,魏晓丽.规范化护理对急危重症患者转运安全率的影响[J].国际护理学杂志,2020,39(13):2332-2334.
[8] 张曦,杨红英,朱艳芳,林菊花.品管圈护理对于提高急危重症患者抢救成功率效果分析[J].中国社区医师,2021,37(03):179-180.
[9] 王静博.护理风险管理对急危重症患者院内转运风险事件的预防[J].实用临床护理学电子杂志,2019,4(22):163-164.
[10] 赵学玲.便携式气动呼吸机配合转运护理在急危重症患者院内转运中的应用效果[J].医疗装备,2019,32(06):163-164.
[11] 刘晓颖,高健,史冬雷.急危重症患者标准化院内分级转运体系的实施与效果[J].中国护理管理,2019,19(03):394-400.
[12] 杨春花.预见性护理在院前急救急危重症患者转运中的应用效果观察[J].医学理论与实践,2018,31(11):1691-1692+1667.
引用本文
何乾峰, 苑静, 何佩瑶, 班菲, 白惠, 王红, 杨亚芸, 刘佩肖, 樊惠强, 李雪, 姚鑫, 徐璐瑶, 预见性护理在院前急危重症患者急救与转运中的应用探讨[J]. 当代护理, 2022; 3: (10) : 151-154.