期刊目次

加入编委

期刊订阅

添加您的邮件地址以接收即将发行期刊数据:

Open Access Article

Contemporary Nursing. 2022; 3: (9) ; 124-127 ; DOI: 10.12208/j.cn.20220418.

linical application and nursing intervention of risk assessment of inpatients with mental illness in female mental patients
住院精神病患者风险评估在女性精神病患者临床应用与护理干预

作者: 廖恒 *

成都市第四人民医院 四川成都

*通讯作者: 廖恒,单位:成都市第四人民医院 四川成都;

发布时间: 2022-09-14 总浏览量: 382

摘要

目的 对住院精神病患者进行风险评估,并采取对应的护理干预措施,分析对患者病情的影响。方法 选取我院接受治疗的女性精神病患者作为本次研究对象,研究共纳入的样本量为60例,患者的收治时间在2020年1月-2021年8月,按照随机数字表法,将参与研究患者分为观察组(采取风险评估及护理干预)和对照组(采取常规护理),每组30例。对比分析两组的干预效果。结果 两组患者在经过对应的护理干预后,从意外事件发生概率进行分析,两组数据存在明显差异,观察组要显著低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);并且从两组的生活质量评分改善方面比较,观察组要显著高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 在女性住院精神病患者的临床治疗中,对患者采取风险评估,掌握患者的风险行为,予以对应的护理干预措施,能够改善患者的生活质量,降低风险事件的发生概率,保证了患者的安全。

关键词: 住院精神病患者;风险评估;护理干预

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the risk of inpatients with mental illness, and to take corresponding nursing intervention measures to analyze the impact on the patient's condition.
Methods: The female mentally ill patients who received treatment in our hospital were selected as the research objects. The sample size included in the study was 60 cases. The patients were admitted from January 2020 to August 2021. According to the random number table method, the participants were enrolled The study patients were divided into an observation group (taking risk assessment and nursing intervention) and a control group (taking routine nursing care), with 30 cases in each group. The intervention effects of the two groups were compared and analyzed.
Results: After the corresponding nursing intervention, the two groups of patients were analyzed from the probability of accidental events. There were significant differences in the data between the two groups. The observation group was significantly lower than the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). Compared with the improvement of quality of life scores between the two groups, the observation group was significantly higher than the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05).
Conclusion  : In the clinical treatment of female inpatients with mental illness, taking risk assessments on the patients, grasping the risk behaviors of the patients, and taking corresponding nursing intervention measures can improve the quality of life of the patients, reduce the probability of risk events, and ensure the safety of the patients.

Key words: Inpatient psychiatric patients; risk assessment; nursing intervention

参考文献 References

[1] 王美,郝军锋. 强制性住院治疗的精神病患者暴力行为风险评估及护理干预[J]. 中国医药科学,2019,9(14):97-101.

[2] 廖亚兰,郑桂珍,杨琼花. 暴力风险评估在严重精神障碍患者安全管理中的应用[J]. 卫生职业教育,2019,37(10):132-134.

[3] 周红丽,李菲菲,王淑芬,等. 护理风险评估在精神科监护期患者中的应用[J]. 国际护理学杂志,2020,39(4):652-655. 

[4] 智颖. 精神科住院患者护理风险评估及干预方法的探讨[J]. 中国医药指南,2019,17(5):274-275.

[5] 崔小玉. 精神病患者入院三级护理风险评估单的应用及探讨[J]. 基层医学论坛,2019,23(15):2187-2188. 

[6] 程苓苓. 跌倒风险评估及干预对住院慢性精神疾病患者跌倒防范的效果评价[J]. 当代护士(上旬刊),2020,27(9):107-109.

[7] 陈刚,黄杰萍,谭桂燕,等. 自杀风险评估的分层护理干预对住院精神分裂症患者的影响[J]. 齐鲁护理杂志,2020,26(19):80-83. 

[8] 齐晓晖,王楠. 精神分裂症住院患者的风险评估及护理措施[J]. 西北国防医学杂志,2020,41(12):770-774. 

[9] 覃玉香. 个性化护理干预在女性精神病患者中的应用价值[J]. 妇儿健康导刊,2021,11(7):30-33.

引用本文

廖恒, 住院精神病患者风险评估在女性精神病患者临床应用与护理干预[J]. 当代护理, 2022; 3: (9) : 124-127.