Nursing intervention strategies for patients with post-traumatic stress disorder
创伤后应激障碍患者的护理干预对策

摘要

目的 分析研究创伤后应激障碍患者采取护理干预的效果。方法 46例研究对象选自2020年3月-2021年3月期间收治的创伤后应激障碍患者。为了满足此次研究需要，本次采取随机数字表法分组，其中一组设为对照组，此组采取的护理方法为常规护理，另一组设为实验组，此组采取的护理方法为应激障碍护理，每组各23例。为了验证两种护理方法对应激障碍患者的护理效果，以焦虑抑郁评分、应激障碍症状评分、生活质量以及依从性进行评价。结果 实验组焦虑抑郁评分和对照组比较结果可见，两组护理前对比差异无法满足统计学含义（P＞0.05），护理后实验组相对较低（P＜0.05）。实验组应激障碍症状评分和对照组比较结果可见，两组护理前对比差异无法满足统计学含义（P＞0.05），护理后实验组相比较对照组较低（P＜0.05）。实验组的生活质量和对照组比较结果可见，两组护理前对比差异无法满足统计学含义（P＞0.05），护理后实验组相比较对照组较高（P＜0.05）。实验组依从性和对照组比较结果可见，实验组相对较高（P＜0.05）。结论 在创伤后应激障碍患者采取应激障碍护理，可对患者的负面情绪予以消除，改善其应激障碍相关症状，同时能够提升其生活质量。此外还能够对患者的依从性予以提升。由此看来，应激障碍护理在创伤后应激障碍患者的护理具有重要意义。

Abstract

Objective To analyze the effect of nursing intervention in patients with post-traumatic stress disorder.
Methods 46 subjects were selected from patients with post-traumatic stress disorder who were admitted from March 2020 to March 2021. In order to meet the needs of this research, the random number table method was adopted for grouping. One group was set as the control group, the nursing method adopted in this group was routine nursing, and the other group was set as the experimental group, and the nursing method adopted in this group was the Nursing of stimulation disorder, 23 cases in each group. In order to verify the nursing effect of the two nursing methods on the patients with stress disorder, the anxiety and depression score, stress disorder symptom score, quality of life and compliance were evaluated.
Results The anxiety and depression scores of the experimental group were compared with those of the control group. The difference between the two groups before nursing could not meet statistical significance (P>0.05), and the experimental group was relatively lower after nursing (P<0.05). The comparison results of stress disorder symptom scores in the experimental group and the control group showed that the difference between the two groups before nursing could not meet statistical significance (P>0.05), and the experimental group was lower than the control group after nursing (P<0.05). The comparison results of the quality of life of the experimental group and the control group showed that the difference between the two groups before nursing could not meet the statistical significance (P>0.05), and the experimental group was higher than the control group after nursing (P<0.05). Comparing the compliance of the experimental group with that of the control group, the experimental group was relatively higher (P<0.05).
Conclusion   Taking stress disorder nursing care in patients with post-traumatic stress disorder can eliminate the negative emotions of patients, improve their stress disorder-related symptoms, and improve their quality of life. It can also improve patient compliance. From this point of view, stress disorder nursing is of great significance in the care of patients with post-traumatic stress disorder.