The application effect of general practice care in elderly patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease was analyzed
分析全科护理对老年慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者的应用效果

摘要

目的 观察全科护理用于老年慢性阻塞性肺疾病的价值。方法 对2020年1月-2021年10月本科接诊老年慢性阻塞性肺疾病病人（n=82）进行随机分组，试验和对照组各41人，前者采取全科护理，后者行常规护理。对比肺功能等指标。结果 关于FVC和FEV1，试验组的数据分别是（2.78±0.31）L、（2.01±0.34）L，和对照组（1.49±0.15）L、（1.25±0.21）L相比更高（P＜0.05）。关于6min步行距离，在干预结束之时：试验组的数据（395.41±29.68）m，和对照组（317.54±27.31）m相比更远（P＜0.05）。关于满意度，试验组的数据97.56%，和对照组80.49%相比更高（P＜0.05）。关于护理纠纷，试验组的发生率0，和对照组12.2%相比更低（P＜0.05）。结论 老年慢性阻塞性肺疾病用全科护理，满意度提升更加明显，肺功能改善更为迅速，6min步行距离也更远，护理纠纷发生率更低。

Abstract

Objective: To observe the value of general practice care for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in the elderly.
Methods: Elderly patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (n=82) were admitted from January 2020 to October 2021 and randomized, with 41 patients each in the control group, with the former taking general care and the latter taking routine care. Contrast the lung function and other indicators.
Results: For FVC and FEV1, the data were (2.78 ± 0.31) L, (2.01 ± 0.34) L, and L, (1.49 ± 0.25 ± 0.25) L (P <0.05). For 6min walking distance, at the end of the intervention: data from the trial group (395.41 ± 29.68) m was further away than that from the control group (317.54 ± 27.31) m (P <0.05). Regarding satisfaction, the test group data was 97.56%, higher than 80.49% in the control group (P <0.05). Regarding nursing disputes, the incidence of 0 in the trial group was lower compared with 12.2% in the control group (P <0.05).
Conclusion  : In general care for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in the elderly, we improved satisfaction, improved lung function more rapidly, farther distance from 6min walking distance, and lower incidence of nursing disputes.