Open Access Article
Contemporary Nursing. 2020; 1: (3) ; 351-353 ; DOI: 10.12208/j.cn.20200115.
*通讯作者： 戴国丽,单位：云南省第一人民医院昆明理工大学附属医院急诊创伤外科 云南昆明；
发布时间: 2020-09-15 总浏览量: 180
目的 分析对于急诊科护理带教过程中，实施持续质量改进的应用效果。方法 选取时间段为2018.12月~2019.12月期间，于我院急诊科进行护理实习的实习护士共计96例，将其作为本次实验的研究对象，并按照带教方式的不同分为对照组和观察组，每组实习护士均45例。对照组实施常规的护理带教方式，观察组则是在护理带教中应用持续质量改进措施，对比分析两组实习护士在接受不同带教方式后的综合成绩优良率以及实习考核成绩。结果 对比两组实习护士的综合成绩优良率，观察组为97.77%，对照组为84.44%，观察组明显优于对照组，数据对比差异显著，（P＜0.05），存在统计学意义。此外，对比两组实习护士的考核成绩，观察组实践考核成绩和理论考核成绩分别为（88.95±1.76）分、（92.47±2.43）分，对照组实践考核成绩和理论考核成绩分别为（74.52±2.33）分、（76.58±2.23）分，观察组成绩更具优势，组间比较，数据差异显著，（P＜0.05），具有统计学意义。结论 在急诊科护理带教中应用持续护理质量改进措施，具有较好的应用效果，有助于促进实习护士综合素质能力的提高，使其更好的胜任护理岗位。
Objective: To analyze the application effect of continuous quality improvement in the nursing teaching of emergency department. Methods: A total of 96 intern nurses who performed nursing internships in the emergency department of our hospital from December 2018 to December 2019 were selected as the research object of this experiment, and were divided into control and observation groups according to different teaching methods. There are 45 cases of intern nurses in each group. The control group implemented conventional nursing teaching methods, while the observation group applied continuous quality improvement measures in nursing teaching. The comparative analysis of the two groups of intern nurses' comprehensive scores of excellent performance and internship assessment results after receiving different teaching methods. Results: Comparing the excellent rate of comprehensive performance of the two groups of practice nurses, the observation group was 97.77%, the control group was 84.44%, the observation group was significantly better than the control group, the data comparison was significantly different, (P <0.05), there is statistical significance. In addition, comparing the assessment results of the two groups of practice nurses, the observation group's practical assessment results and theoretical assessment results were (88.95 ± 1.76) points and (92.47 ± 2.43) points respectively, while the control group practical assessment results and theoretical assessment results were (74.52 ± 2.33) points, (76.58 ± 2.23) points, the results of the observation group are more advantageous, compared between groups, the data difference is significant, (P <0.05), with statistical significance. Conclusion : The application of continuous nursing quality improvement measures in the nursing teaching of emergency department has good application effect, which helps to promote the improvement of the comprehensive quality of nurses and make them better qualified for nursing positions.